|
|
CRUcial Times Issue 26 - EditorialJane Sherwin Across time and across issues, dissatisfaction about the way things
are has led people to imagine better things, to find like-minded others,
and to find alternative ways of doing things. In the lives of people
with disabilities and families, there is increasing dissatisfaction
with progress in terms of people achieving ordinary lives, in homes
of their choosing, in customary lifestyles, regular education, employment
and recreation. Did the community living movement miss the mark? Were we fighting so hard for the closure of institutions that we failed to see that a dominance by services in people’s lives would not be as enabling as we had hoped? Were we sleeping while market and business paradigms overtook the government and community sectors? Did we stand by while our government and service system began an enduring love affair with the idea that people with disabilities and families are mere commodities? Where was our astonishment as they became wedded to content-free management, to assessments, models, regulations, and to a set menu of service types? Did we fail to see that what was actually happening was a situation
where communities, and the individuals in them, were becoming managed?
Consultations and opportunities for influencing the course of the future
have become forums for sanctioning those things that have already been
decided by those with the power. Mechanisms that could be expected to
allow greater levels of authority by individuals in their own lives,
such as individualised funding and individual planning processes, have
instead become the tools of standardisation. The impact of all this
on individuals and families is that there is an increasing sense of
powerlessness, and a sense of frustration that the future holds more
of the same. The service system grinds ever onwards, growing at a rapid
rate, becoming increasingly more complex, and more powerful than the
ordinary citizens who just want a decent life, and help to get it. The
service system works in ways that have become an exercise of power and
control in the name of supporting people to live in the community. A movement for change, such as the community living movement, consists of a network of relationships, ideas about what is important, and sets of actions. These actions do not need to be in the realm of public rallies, although they could be, but they also include actions which lead to enduring and positive change. We need consciousness-raising of the kind we have seen in the peace movement, the women’s movement, and the environment and indigenous movements. While many people in the disability sector have been engaged in working towards ‘good lives’ and good ways of supporting people, their ideas and language have been co-opted by government and the service system and used in ways that show low levels of consciousness about what is really needed to support people well. The community living movement needs investment in ethical leadership, and stronger network relationships. We need to create opportunities for fostering different ways of doing things. We need energy, sophistication, social unrest, and political determination. It may be that what we are now pursuing has moved beyond the ideas underpinning ‘the community living movement’. It may be that the movement is still evolving, and that we are yet to name what is now being pursued. This edition of CRUcial Times brings into sharper consciousness the
critical importance of true community living, and the importance of
being engaged in a broad, social movement to make this possible for
all people with disabilities. The CRU Conference, ‘Gathering the
Wisdom’ will be an opportunity to hear others illuminate these
important matters of our time, and of the future. We look forward to
your company. |
|
© 2002-2010 Community Resource Unit Inc. email: cru@cru.org.au last updated: 2 August 2004 accessibility and site info | privacy and copyright | site map |